[Rcpp-devel] Differences between RcppEigen and RcppArmadillo
antonio at piccolboni.info
Mon Jun 18 22:15:21 CEST 2012
Ooops, wrong JIT! Dirk is absolutely right. I meant to say see enableJIT is
the compiler package, see
I second Dirk's comments on Ra.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> On 18 June 2012 at 11:55, Antonio Piccolboni wrote:
> | On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:09 PM, c s <conradsand.arma at gmail.com> wrote:
> | Another is
> | R. I believe R currently doesn't have a JIT compiler (I haven't
> | checked lately), and hence the very useful Rcpp fills in the
> | performance gap.
> | Still work in progress but see
> | Doesn't replace Rcpp by any stretch of the imagination, but may close
> the gap a
> | little bit.
> Sadly, Ra and jit are no longer maintained by Stephen Milborrow.
> I actually used to provided a patched binary for this within Debian. This
> ahead of its time (ginve the renewed interest in JITs from LLVM and other
> places) and quite useful, but Ra/jit is at this point a dead project.
> Dirk Eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rcpp-devel