[RQt-devel] qtbase mac issues resolved

[Michael Lawrence]

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:27 PM, hadley wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote:

> >> It seems like for a given package we should pick one style and stick
> >> with it.  Since all the Qt objects are mutable, maybe using $
> >> accessors throughout the API makes the most sense.
> >
> > I think this is the policy I have followed more or less. Only the
> > constructors have special wrappers.. and there are some special things
> like
> > S3 methods on dim().
>
> Now I'm having second thoughts about this - I think we need a package
> (maybe not qtpaint) that can be used with the usual R syntax.  You
> might not be able to access all the advanced features, but you should
> be able to do the basics.  This probably involves only writing a few
> more wrappers.
>
>
Wouldn't the high-level abstraction play this role?


> Hadley
>
> --
> Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair
> Department of Statistics / Rice University
> http://had.co.nz/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/qtinterfaces-devel/attachments/20100322/6bd4476a/attachment.htm