<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:27 PM, hadley wickham <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:h.wickham@gmail.com">h.wickham@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">>> It seems like for a given package we should pick one style and stick<br>
>> with it. Since all the Qt objects are mutable, maybe using $<br>
>> accessors throughout the API makes the most sense.<br>
><br>
> I think this is the policy I have followed more or less. Only the<br>
> constructors have special wrappers.. and there are some special things like<br>
> S3 methods on dim().<br>
<br>
</div>Now I'm having second thoughts about this - I think we need a package<br>
(maybe not qtpaint) that can be used with the usual R syntax. You<br>
might not be able to access all the advanced features, but you should<br>
be able to do the basics. This probably involves only writing a few<br>
more wrappers.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>Wouldn't the high-level abstraction play this role?<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div class="h5">
Hadley<br>
<br>
--<br>
Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair<br>
Department of Statistics / Rice University<br>
<a href="http://had.co.nz/" target="_blank">http://had.co.nz/</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>