[Rsiena-help] clarification on changelog for RSienaTest rev.93

[Tom Snijders]

Dear Marco,

Note that the bipartite network version of RSiena still is a beta version, and it is not yet totally clear to me that it does what it should do eventually. In particular, I am not sure that in the ministeps, the option to leave things unchanged is implemented yet. Ruth, perhaps you could also comment on whether this option is implemented?

Best wishes,

Tom

============================================
Tom A.B. Snijders
Professor of Statistics in the Social Sciences
Department of Politics and Department of Statistics
Nuffield College
University of Oxford
tel. +44-01865-278599
http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/snijders/

________________________________
From: rsiena-help-bounces at lists.r-forge.r-project.org [mailto:rsiena-help-bounces at lists.r-forge.r-project.org] On Behalf Of marco tonellato
Sent: 08 June 2010 11:14
To: rsiena-help at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
Subject: [Rsiena-help] clarification on changelog for RSienaTest rev.93

Dear Ruth,

I just read the changelog for RSienaTest rev.93 (04.06.2010), and I saw those messages:
"Using composition change with bipartite networks will give an error message - until this is corrected". And "Bug fix to treatment of missing data in sparse format bipartite networks".

Since I'm actually using sparse bipartite networks with composition change (RSiena rev.92) I was wondering whether the problem was there before and you fixed it or whether the problem wasn't there before and you signaled it.
Can you please elaborate on that?

Thanks. Regards,
Marco

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rsiena-help/attachments/20100608/786128ba/attachment.htm>