[Rcpp-devel] Distribution of Rcpp codebase
Martyn Plummer
plummerm at iarc.fr
Tue Apr 8 10:36:22 CEST 2014
And another 2 cents from me.
A package is the basic unit of functionality in R. Whatever
functionality you are providing, I think a package is the best way to
deliver it. There is a well developed framework for versioning,
dependency resolution, testing, and distribution.
If you choose some other mechanism, then I suspect that any developer
problems you eliminate will just return as system administration
problems.
Martyn
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 10:12 +0200, Xavier Robin wrote:
> My 2 cents...
>
> On 07/04/14 10:12, Romain François wrote:
> > It would also mean many copies of the same code base. To which I’m thinking: so what.
> No, it will mean many copies of /many different and mostly outdated/
> code bases.
> You can count on me to forget to git pull next time I update my package.
>
> What about something like the BH package that contains the boost
> headers? I'm using it in a project I'm working on, and just use a
> LinkingTo declaration with something in Makevars.
> Of course ideally it would be in a build-depends type of declaration so
> it isn't pulled during binary installs.
>
> Xavier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rcpp-devel mailing list
> Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
More information about the Rcpp-devel
mailing list