[Rcpp-devel] conflict between R_ext/Applic.h and RcppArmadillo.h?

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

Hi Richard.

On 2 March 2012 at 10:32, Richard Chandler wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
| 
| Thanks for those suggestions. I am trying them both but without
| success so far. I will keep at it, but first, I wonder how serious
| these warnings are? I can still pass R CMD check, and my program seems

You never showed them to us, so we can't tell.

| to work very well. Could something disastrous happen if I ignore the
| warnings? Do you think CRAN would accept the package?

For CRAN you probably want a package framework anyway rather than an inline
call.  And what R CMD check says matters -- which is a superset of compiler
warnings plus a boatload or two of other tests.  Which are sometimes a pain,
but beneficial to all of us in the long run.

Dirk
 
| Richard
| 
| On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
| >
| > Richard,
| >
| > On 1 March 2012 at 15:36, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > |
| > | Hi Richard,
| > |
| > | On 1 March 2012 at 16:25, Richard Chandler wrote:
| > | | Hi,
| > | |
| > | | I am trying to call Rdqags (from R_ext/Applic.h) in a C++ program that
| > | | uses RcppArmadillo. Everything seems to work fine except the compiler
| > | | warns about conflicts. Is there a way to avoid these conflicts? Could
| > | | they cause any unforeseen problems? Below is a self-contained example
| > | | illustrating the problem. Note that RcppArmadillo is not actually
| > | | required in the example, but it is in my program. See below for
| > | | sessionInfo().
| >
| > Another idea would be to dig up some old posts on the about how Rcpp lets you
| > get R API access points directly.  Davor used that to get to loess.  That way
| > you would get to use Rdqags but without needing the conflicting header.  Just
| > another thought.
| >
| > Dirk
| >
| > --
| > "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too
| > dark to read." -- Groucho Marx

-- 
"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too
dark to read." -- Groucho Marx