[Rcpp-devel] conflict between R_ext/Applic.h and RcppArmadillo.h?

[Richard Chandler]

Hi Dirk,

Thanks for those suggestions. I am trying them both but without
success so far. I will keep at it, but first, I wonder how serious
these warnings are? I can still pass R CMD check, and my program seems
to work very well. Could something disastrous happen if I ignore the
warnings? Do you think CRAN would accept the package?

Richard

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
>
> Richard,
>
> On 1 March 2012 at 15:36, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | Hi Richard,
> |
> | On 1 March 2012 at 16:25, Richard Chandler wrote:
> | | Hi,
> | |
> | | I am trying to call Rdqags (from R_ext/Applic.h) in a C++ program that
> | | uses RcppArmadillo. Everything seems to work fine except the compiler
> | | warns about conflicts. Is there a way to avoid these conflicts? Could
> | | they cause any unforeseen problems? Below is a self-contained example
> | | illustrating the problem. Note that RcppArmadillo is not actually
> | | required in the example, but it is in my program. See below for
> | | sessionInfo().
>
> Another idea would be to dig up some old posts on the about how Rcpp lets you
> get R API access points directly.  Davor used that to get to loess.  That way
> you would get to use Rdqags but without needing the conflicting header.  Just
> another thought.
>
> Dirk
>
> --
> "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too
> dark to read." -- Groucho Marx