[Rcpp-devel] Appropriate scope of Rcpp-quickref?

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

On 17 December 2010 at 18:40, Romain Francois wrote:
| Le 17/12/10 17:13, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
| >
| > On 17 December 2010 at 09:04, Christian Gunning wrote:
| > | I was wondering if Rcpp-quickref is an appropriate place for
| > | information about RcppArmadillo, RcppGSL, etc.  It seems like a nice
| > | place to centralize information, as well as "advertise" the other
| > | packages.  Likewise, Rcpp-quickref is always available since
| > | RcppArmadillo etc. depend on Rcpp.  The chief downside seems to me to
| > | be a long document...
| > |
| > | Thoughts?
| >
| > Just finishing / completing Rcpp-quickref is already going to be a lot of
| > work so adding to the pile doesn't really help.   OTOH RcppArmadillo is a
| > very useful core addition so one could document the wrappers / converters.
| >
| > Doing beats talking any day though. :)  Any addition is a good one at this
| > stage.
| >
| > Dirk
| 
| I believe the quickref vignette should be short and scope only Rcpp itself.
| 
| We could discuss an RcppArmadillo-quickref vignette.

Yep and yep. Works for me too.

Dirk

-- 
Dirk Eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com