[RQt-devel] recent smoke update
Michael Lawrence
lawrence.michael at gene.com
Sat Jan 23 01:55:38 CET 2010
Just the native types.
On Jan 22, 2010 4:28 PM, "Deepayan Sarkar" <deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Michael Lawrence
<lawrence.michael at gene.com> wrote:
> I'm now thinking we're better off drinking the kool-aid and moving to S4
for > representing these ...
Hmm...no strong opinions, so I'll go with whatever you decide. I
assume this only applies for the classes we would want natively
represented, as it would be too much work defining S4 classes for all
smoke-supported Qt classes? (Or maybe that can be done by
automatically generated code.)
Anyway, let me know if I can help with this. I'm off on a short break
(without internet access), but back on Tuesday.
-Deepayan
> If we did that though, we'd want to be pretty consistent, so even QMatrix
> would become an S4 cl...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/qtinterfaces-devel/attachments/20100122/4406f194/attachment.htm
More information about the Qtinterfaces-devel
mailing list