<p>Just the native types. <br>
</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On Jan 22, 2010 4:28 PM, "Deepayan Sarkar" <<a href="mailto:deepayan.sarkar@gmail.com">deepayan.sarkar@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Michael Lawrence<br>
<p><font color="#500050"><<a href="mailto:lawrence.michael@gene.com">lawrence.michael@gene.com</a>> wrote:
</font></p><p><font color="#500050">> I'm now thinking we're better off drinking the kool-aid and moving to S4 for
> representing these ...</font></p>Hmm...no strong opinions, so I'll go with whatever you decide. I<br>
assume this only applies for the classes we would want natively<br>
represented, as it would be too much work defining S4 classes for all<br>
smoke-supported Qt classes? (Or maybe that can be done by<br>
automatically generated code.)<br>
<br>
Anyway, let me know if I can help with this. I'm off on a short break<br>
(without internet access), but back on Tuesday.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-Deepayan<br>
</font><p><font color="#500050">
> If we did that though, we'd want to be pretty consistent, so even QMatrix
> would become an S4 cl...</font></p></blockquote></p>