[GSoC-PortA] Portfolio Vignette
Peter Carl
peter at braverock.com
Thu Sep 19 15:58:57 CEST 2013
Ross, this looks fantastic. I'll follow up with some thoughts, but I think this is very impressive overall. You've had a great summer! pcc
Sent from my HTC Inspire™ 4G on AT&T
----- Reply message -----
From: "Brian G. Peterson" <brian at braverock.com>
To: "PortfolioAnalytics" <gsoc-porta at r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at>
Subject: [GSoC-PortA] Portfolio Vignette
Date: Thu, Sep 19, 2013 4:20 am
On 09/18/2013 04:38 PM, Ross Bennett wrote:
> All,
>
> In commit r3130, I added a lot of content and charts to the
> portfolio_vignette. I'm still working on the placement and formatting of
> some of the charts, but overall I think this is a pretty good
> introduction to specify the portfolio object, add constraints and
> objectives, and run a few example optimizations.
>
> If anyone has a chance to read through it, I would appreciate any and
> all feedback about existing content or any content that should be added.
>
> The compiled pdf is in the vignettes folder as portfolio_vignette.pdf.
Ross,
Thanks for doing this, it's looking very good.
I'm impressed by the comparison of the different random portfolio
methods. It's pretty clear that at fev=0.05 the simplex method will
concentrate more towards the individual assets while the sample method
will get a more even distribution in the interior and near the edges.
It's key to note that depending on your objective, you may very well not
have an optimal solution along the vertexes. For example, risk
contribution or risk budget objectives will likely place the optimal
portfolio somewhere in the interior. The min-ERC portfolio lies along a
line between the minimum variance portfolio and the EW portfolio.
I wonder why you're using all the page space you are to separate the
weights plot from the scatter plot. Maybe once to demonstrate that they
are separate functions, but it seems that when you want to display both
right next to each other, just calling plot() on the output of
optimize.portfolio would be s more efficient use of space. e.g. Fig
4/5, 6/7, 8/9, 10/11, 12/13, 15/16 etc.
I also wonder if most of section 5.2 could be separated into a separate
vignette specifically discussing the different methods of doing random
portfolios, the algorithms themselves, and more completely describing
the differences, but that can always happen after GSoC.
--
Brian G. Peterson
http://braverock.com/brian/
Ph: 773-459-4973
IM: bgpbraverock
_______________________________________________
GSoC-PortA mailing list
GSoC-PortA at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gsoc-porta
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/gsoc-porta/attachments/20130919/71a02035/attachment.html>
More information about the GSoC-PortA
mailing list