[datatable-help] What about this FR ?
stat quant
statquant at outlook.com
Fri Oct 11 19:28:51 CEST 2013
Not really...
2013/10/10 Eduard Antonyan <eduard.antonyan at gmail.com>
> Do you think it might be better to submit the speed FR to zoo instead?
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:14 AM, stat quant <statquant at outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> Speed is not too good and even behaviour is strange.
>> I really think this is anyway a very usefull feature and that data.table
>> should implement it (so you would not need zoo)
>> na.locf might do fancy stuff you don't need
>>
>> I implemented mine with Rcpp, truly it is just a for loop and that's it...
>>
>>
>> 2013/10/9 Eduard Antonyan <eduard.antonyan at gmail.com>
>>
>>> What's unsatisfactory about the zoo function? Speed or smth else?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:54 PM, statquant3 <statquant at outlook.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes you can do it with a window join but that's clearly overshoot...
>>>> Just a very simple function would do
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/What-about-this-FR-tp4677877p4677908.html
>>>>
>>>> Sent from the datatable-help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> datatable-help mailing list
>>>> datatable-help at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
>>>>
>>>> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/datatable-help
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/datatable-help/attachments/20131011/a0d57f34/attachment.html>
More information about the datatable-help
mailing list