[datatable-help] What about this FR ?

Eduard Antonyan eduard.antonyan at gmail.com
Thu Oct 10 17:11:52 CEST 2013


Do you think it might be better to submit the speed FR to zoo instead?


On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:14 AM, stat quant <statquant at outlook.com> wrote:

> Speed is not too good and even behaviour is strange.
> I really think this is anyway a very usefull feature and that data.table
> should implement it (so you would not need zoo)
> na.locf might do fancy stuff you don't need
>
> I implemented mine with Rcpp, truly it is just a for loop and that's it...
>
>
> 2013/10/9 Eduard Antonyan <eduard.antonyan at gmail.com>
>
>> What's unsatisfactory about the zoo function? Speed or smth else?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:54 PM, statquant3 <statquant at outlook.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Yes you can do it with a window join but that's clearly overshoot...
>>> Just a very simple function would do
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/What-about-this-FR-tp4677877p4677908.html
>>>
>>> Sent from the datatable-help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> datatable-help mailing list
>>> datatable-help at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
>>>
>>> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/datatable-help
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/datatable-help/attachments/20131010/fd5501b6/attachment.html>


More information about the datatable-help mailing list