[Biomod-commits] evaluating results

[Pep Serra]

Sorry, I meant Evaluation.results.TSS when I wrote Evaluation.results.Kappa




En/na Pep Serra ha escrit:
> Hi BIOMODers,
>
> I run BIOMOD for some species and I obtained these results which are a 
> bit difficult to interpret to me:
>
> I am checking AUC and TSS model by model and comparing it to the 
> Ensemble modeling approach:
>
>
>
> 	TSS
>
> 	mean
> ANN 	0.70566667
> CTA 	0.7495
> GAM 	0.75466667
> GBM 	0.77866667
> GLM 	0.7365
> MARS 	0.75016667
> MDA 	0.69866667
> RF 	0.80516667
> SRE 	0.436
> EF 	0.97055927
>
>
> I am producing an ensemble forecasting giving weights according to the 
> TSS statistic (decay=1.6). For each model I used the cross-validation 
> result out of Evaluation.results.Kappa.
> Is it possible to obtain a TSS statistic even much better than the 
> best model and the best run of the best model (according to TSS)?
>
> Thanx !
> _______________________________________________
> Biomod-commits mailing list
> Biomod-commits at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biomod-commits
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/biomod-commits/attachments/20091104/e42dc9fc/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: josep_serra.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 448 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/biomod-commits/attachments/20091104/e42dc9fc/attachment.vcf