[Basta-users] BaSTA and known fate/telemetry data
Kissel, Amanda M
akissel at usgs.gov
Fri Nov 21 00:11:13 CET 2025
Hello,
Apologies if I've missed this anywhere in previous posts or documentation, but I'm wondering if the BaSTA modeling framework would be appropriate for use with telemetry data? I'm working with a dataset where ~half of the individuals tracked do not have a "known fate" (i.e., went missing), and thus a traditional known fate survival model does not seem appropriate. Additionally, we have many cases where an animal was tracked to a new location but wasn't physically observed during the tracking event to minimize disturbance (but a visual was obtained on a subsequent tracking event), complicating what we typically think of as a detection. Any insights into whether BaSTA can accommodate these types of data would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Amanda
Amanda Kissel (she/her), PhD
Research Ecologist
US Geological Survey
Fort Collins Science Center
2150 Centre Ave Bldg C
Fort Collins, CO 80526
Work cell: (970) 657-1524
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/basta-users/attachments/20251120/1ecef27f/attachment.htm>
More information about the Basta-users
mailing list