[adegenet-forum] DAPC scatterplot vs membership probabilities

[Carla Riva Rossi]

I'm using DAPC to assess the origin of an introduced salmonid in Patagonia
    and I have problems interpreting my results.
    I used pre-defined groups corresponding to the native range source
    populations and then I applied the predict.dapc function to position the
    introduced individuals (that were not used in constructing the model)
onto
    these discriminant functions (DFs). On the basis of the derived DFs, I
    derived for each introduced individual a membership probability to
original
    source populations.
    Then, In the DAPC scatterplot the introduced individuals (population)
fell
    more in the space with of native pop 1 than with pop 2, but the DAPC
    probabilites indicate more native pop2 ancestry. Which of these two
results
    shoud I give more credit/support?
    Thanks a lot in advance!!!
    Carla.-

-- 
Dra. Carla Riva Rossi
CENPAT-CONICET
Blvd Brown 2915
Puerto Madryn (CP 9120)
Chubut - ARGENTINA
Tel: + 54-280 - 4883184  Interno: 1349
Fax:+ 54-280 - 4883543
email: rivarossi at cenpat- <rivarossi at cenpat.edu.ar>conicet.gob.ar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/adegenet-forum/attachments/20141210/b1b42e69/attachment.html>