[FLR-list] @spwn in FLBiol and @m.spwn and @harvest.spwn in FLStock

[gmail]

I would suggest that it is age dependent in FLBiol, FLBiol is intended 
to test the simplifying assumptions in FLStock, see 
http://fishbull.noaa.gov/1104/fitzhugh.pdf

Laurie


On 23/01/17 10:05, Iago MOSQUEIRA (JRC) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, it is, but the decision on FLStock structure was made a long time 
> ago and will be difficult to change, maybe at some point we can try.
>
> The logic is that @spwn in FLBiol does not need ages, so let's keep it 
> smaller. Depending on your workflow (FLBiol -> FLStock or viceversa) 
> we an look at the accessors, replacement, constructor and coercion 
> methods to make it smoother. For example, coercion from FLBiol to 
> FLStock expands the slot, but maybe the assignment method m.spwn<- 
> could also do it when given an FLQuant with a single age.
>
> How are you converting between both?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Iago
>
> On 21/01/17 16:26, Dorleta Garcia wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> We are updating FLBEIA to the lastest FLCore version and I’ve realized
>> that now ‘spwn’ slot in FLBiol has length equal one in the first
>> dimension, you can create an object with length bigger than one but the
>> validity crashes. However in FLStock object  @m.spwn and @harvest.spwn
>> share the dimension with the rest of age structured stocks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is not this contradictory?
>>
>>
>>
>> I don’t know if it makes sense to have age dependent spawn season but at
>> least both objects should have the same flexibility, or even higher in
>> FLBiols.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks and cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>> Dorleta
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> flr-list mailing list
>> flr-list at flr-project.org
>> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/flr-list
>>
>