[Traminer-users] events

["Nicolas S. Müller"]

Dear Claire,

The first subsequence (Secpriv>BusAss) is a transition between Secpriv 
and BusAss.

The second subsequence takes into account the initial "state" of the 
individual, which was Secpriv.
Therefore, it can be read as : the individual began in Secpriv, then 
experienced a transition between Secpriv and BusAss.

The first subsequence is obviously a subsequence of the second 
subsequence, but it could also be the subsequence of a sequence like 
(BusAss)-(BusAss>Secpriv)-(Secpriv>BusAss).

I hope I answered your question.
Best regards.
Nicolas

On 05/05/2010 11:30 AM, Claire Lemercier wrote:
> Thanks Alexis!
> A second (and last for today) silly question.
> What is the difference between the two following subsequences (of 
> events):
> (Secpriv>BusAss)
> (Secpriv)-(Secpriv>BusAss)
> They seem to me both to describe a certain length of "Secpriv" 
> followed by a transition to a certain length of "BusAss"?
> All the best,
> Claire.
>
>
> Alexis Gabadinho a écrit :
>> Hi Claire,
>>
>> You can use therefore the "with.missing=TRUE" argument. With this 
>> option the transversal distributions  include the missing state, and 
>> this state appears on the plot with a dedicated color.
>>
>> Here is an example:
>>
>> data(ex1)
>> ex1.seq <- seqdef(ex1, 1:13)
>> seqdplot(ex1.seq, with.missing=TRUE)
>>
>> All the best,
>> Alexis.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Traminer-users mailing list
> Traminer-users at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/traminer-users 
>