[Rsiena-help] Standard Error Estimates
Nate Doogan
doogan.1 at osu.edu
Sun Sep 18 15:40:33 CEST 2011
Hi group.
I will paste two result excerpts. Both are results of the same model on the
same data with the same precision parameters (at least those that I know
of). I chose to use five phase two sub phases, and 1000 phase three
iterations in both estimations.
Here's number one:
11. eval RSB alter -1.1657 ( 0.6275 )
0.0023
12. eval RSB ego -2.5752 ( 1.2052 )
0.0188
13. eval same RSB -0.8655 ( 0.7055 )
0.0462
Behavior Dynamics
14. rate rate RSB period 1 1.4035 ( 0.1899 )
-0.0589
15. eval behavior RSB linear shape -1.0667 ( 0.1923 )
-0.0408
16. eval behavior RSB average similarity 0.8539 ( 0.3881 )
0.0015
Here's number two:
11. eval RSB alter -1.1412 ( 1.9588 )
0.0015
12. eval RSB ego -2.6017 ( 2.6454 )
-0.0682
13. eval same RSB -0.8478 ( 2.1887 )
0.0587
Behavior Dynamics
14. rate rate RSB period 1 1.4049 ( 0.1531 )
-0.0373
15. eval behavior RSB linear shape -1.0670 ( 0.2532 )
0.0160
16. eval behavior RSB average similarity 0.8468 ( 0.7681 )
-0.0453
The only difference is that I asked for the simulated nets in number two
(returnDeps=T). In my opinion, the parameter estimates of these two fits are
acceptably close. I don't believe that the standard errors are, however. My
decision to reject would vary in these estimates for effects 11, 12, and 16.
Is it likely that my data is odd in that way? Or is there a software
parameter that will allow me to perhaps trade some time for some precision
in the estimation of standard errors?
Nathan Doogan
Doctoral Student
The Ohio State University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rsiena-help/attachments/20110918/a35a3a25/attachment.htm>
More information about the Rsiena-help
mailing list