[Rcpp-devel] Using Rcpp with <nloptrApi.h> results in "shared object 'nloptC.so' not found"
Dirk Eddelbuettel
edd at debian.org
Wed Aug 18 17:18:52 CEST 2021
On 18 August 2021 at 16:36, Simon Zehnder wrote:
| I am using R 4.0.5 on a Fedora 34 System, Rcpp 1.0.6 and nloptr 1.2.2.2.
Works here (Ubuntu 21.04, Rcpp 1.0.7) (see [1] below)
Works at CRAN (see [2] below)
Works at universe (see [3] below)
I would suspect the error is at your end.
Dirk
[1] Running via rcc.r from littler wrapping rcmdcheck
edd at rob:~/git/rcppnloptexample(master)$ rcc.r RcppNLoptExample_0.1.0.tar.gz
── R CMD check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
─ using log directory ‘/tmp/file2b4b7523aee48f/RcppNLoptExample.Rcheck’
─ using R version 4.1.1 (2021-08-10)
─ using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
─ using session charset: UTF-8
✔ checking for file ‘RcppNLoptExample/DESCRIPTION’ ...
─ checking extension type ... Package
─ this is package ‘RcppNLoptExample’ version ‘0.1.0’
─ package encoding: UTF-8
✔ checking package namespace information ...
✔ checking package dependencies (803ms)
✔ checking package namespace information ...
✔ checking package dependencies (803ms)
✔ checking if this is a source package
✔ checking if there is a namespace
✔ checking for executable files ...
✔ checking for hidden files and directories
✔ checking for portable file names
✔ checking for sufficient/correct file permissions
✔ checking whether package ‘RcppNLoptExample’ can be installed (6.3s)
✔ checking installed package size ...
✔ checking package directory
✔ checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ...
✔ checking top-level files
✔ checking for left-over files
✔ checking index information
✔ checking package subdirectories ...
✔ checking R files for non-ASCII characters ...
✔ checking R files for syntax errors ...
✔ checking whether the package can be loaded ...
✔ checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ...
✔ checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ...
✔ checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ...
✔ checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ...
✔ checking loading without being on the library search path ...
✔ checking dependencies in R code ...
✔ checking S3 generic/method consistency (430ms)
✔ checking replacement functions ...
✔ checking foreign function calls ...
✔ checking R code for possible problems (931ms)
✔ checking Rd files ...
✔ checking Rd metadata ...
✔ checking Rd cross-references ...
✔ checking for missing documentation entries ...
✔ checking for code/documentation mismatches (679ms)
✔ checking Rd \usage sections (549ms)
✔ checking Rd contents ...
✔ checking for unstated dependencies in examples ...
✔ checking line endings in C/C++/Fortran sources/headers
✔ checking line endings in Makefiles
✔ checking compilation flags in Makevars ...
✔ checking for GNU extensions in Makefiles
✔ checking for portable use of $(BLAS_LIBS) and $(LAPACK_LIBS)
✔ checking use of PKG_*FLAGS in Makefiles
✔ checking compilation flags used
✔ checking compiled code ...
✔ checking examples (424ms)
✔ checking PDF version of manual (2.5s)
edd at rob:~/git/rcppnloptexample(master)$
[2] https://cloud.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RcppNLoptExample.html
[3] https://eddelbuettel.r-universe.dev/ui#builds and also
https://github.com/r-universe/eddelbuettel/actions/runs/1047649769
|
| Thanks for any time and efforts you spent on my problem.
| Simon
| _______________________________________________
| Rcpp-devel mailing list
| Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
| https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
--
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
More information about the Rcpp-devel
mailing list