[Rcpp-devel] Using Rcpp with <nloptrApi.h> results in "shared object 'nloptC.so' not found"

Dirk Eddelbuettel edd at debian.org
Wed Aug 18 17:18:52 CEST 2021


On 18 August 2021 at 16:36, Simon Zehnder wrote:
| I am using R 4.0.5 on a Fedora 34 System, Rcpp 1.0.6 and nloptr 1.2.2.2.

Works here (Ubuntu 21.04, Rcpp 1.0.7) (see [1] below)

Works at CRAN (see [2] below)

Works at universe (see [3] below)

I would suspect the error is at your end.

Dirk

[1] Running via rcc.r from littler wrapping rcmdcheck

edd at rob:~/git/rcppnloptexample(master)$ rcc.r RcppNLoptExample_0.1.0.tar.gz 
── R CMD check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
─  using log directory ‘/tmp/file2b4b7523aee48f/RcppNLoptExample.Rcheck’
─  using R version 4.1.1 (2021-08-10)                                                                    
─  using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
─  using session charset: UTF-8   
✔  checking for file ‘RcppNLoptExample/DESCRIPTION’ ...
─  checking extension type ... Package
─  this is package ‘RcppNLoptExample’ version ‘0.1.0’
─  package encoding: UTF-8
✔  checking package namespace information ...
✔  checking package dependencies (803ms)
✔  checking package namespace information ...
✔  checking package dependencies (803ms)
✔  checking if this is a source package
✔  checking if there is a namespace
✔  checking for executable files ...
✔  checking for hidden files and directories
✔  checking for portable file names
✔  checking for sufficient/correct file permissions
✔  checking whether package ‘RcppNLoptExample’ can be installed (6.3s)
✔  checking installed package size ...
✔  checking package directory
✔  checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ...
✔  checking top-level files
✔  checking for left-over files
✔  checking index information
✔  checking package subdirectories ...
✔  checking R files for non-ASCII characters ...
✔  checking R files for syntax errors ...
✔  checking whether the package can be loaded ...
✔  checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ...
✔  checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ...
✔  checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ...
✔  checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ...
✔  checking loading without being on the library search path ...
✔  checking dependencies in R code ...
✔  checking S3 generic/method consistency (430ms)
✔  checking replacement functions ...
✔  checking foreign function calls ...
✔  checking R code for possible problems (931ms)
✔  checking Rd files ...
✔  checking Rd metadata ...
✔  checking Rd cross-references ...
✔  checking for missing documentation entries ...
✔  checking for code/documentation mismatches (679ms)
✔  checking Rd \usage sections (549ms)
✔  checking Rd contents ...
✔  checking for unstated dependencies in examples ...
✔  checking line endings in C/C++/Fortran sources/headers
✔  checking line endings in Makefiles
✔  checking compilation flags in Makevars ...
✔  checking for GNU extensions in Makefiles
✔  checking for portable use of $(BLAS_LIBS) and $(LAPACK_LIBS)
✔  checking use of PKG_*FLAGS in Makefiles
✔  checking compilation flags used
✔  checking compiled code ...
✔  checking examples (424ms)
✔  checking PDF version of manual (2.5s)
   
   
edd at rob:~/git/rcppnloptexample(master)$ 

[2] https://cloud.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RcppNLoptExample.html

[3] https://eddelbuettel.r-universe.dev/ui#builds and also 
    https://github.com/r-universe/eddelbuettel/actions/runs/1047649769


| 
| Thanks for any time and efforts you spent on my problem.
| Simon
| _______________________________________________
| Rcpp-devel mailing list
| Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
| https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
-- 
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org


More information about the Rcpp-devel mailing list