[Rcpp-devel] Package Submission Barred by Pedantic

[Qiang Kou]

Hi, Dirk,

The warning is

"d:/RCompile/CRANpkg/lib/3.6/BH/include/boost/interprocess/detail/win32_api.hpp:145:9:
warning: ISO C++ prohibits anonymous structs [-Wpedantic]"

It is a Windows-only warning and has been fixed in Boost 1.69.

Best wishes,

KK

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:53 AM Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:

>
> On 17 December 2018 at 13:30, Nicholas Rittler wrote:
> | I've had no luck arguing that this warning is a false positive with Uwe
> | Ligges. How long does this usually take?
>
> Nobody knows. If in doubt, try to make the issue go away.
>
> | What is more, while the issue has been resolved in the Boost code, it
> seems
> | to my untrained eye that winbuidler is indeed setting "-pedantic", which
> | it's not supposed to do. Is that not the implication of the following
> lines
> | from my winbuilder logs, along with the fact that I don't set -pedantic
> in
> | my Makevars.win or Makeconf file?:
> |
> | *** arch - x64
> | d:/Compiler/gcc-4.9.3/mingw_64/bin/g++ -m64
> | -I"D:/RCompile/recent/R/include" -DNDEBUG -I.
> | -I"d:/RCompile/CRANpkg/lib/3.6/BH/include"
> | -I"d:/RCompile/CRANpkg/lib/3.6/bigmemory/include"
> | -I"d:/RCompile/CRANpkg/lib/3.6/Rcpp/include"
> | -I"d:/RCompile/CRANpkg/lib/3.6/RcppArmadillo/include"
> | -I"d:/Compiler/gcc-4.9.3/local330/include"     -pedantic -O2 -Wall
> | -mtune=core2 -c RcppExports.cpp -o RcppExports.o
>
> You can never delete flags for your _package_ which are coming from the _R
> binary_ itself. C'est la vie.
>
> Can you remind us _what your error was_ ?  There are a bazillion config
> options to Boost.  Eg adding -DBOOST_NO_AUTO_PTR tells the Boost library no
> to use an idiom about which newer compiler complain a lot. (And eg I sent a
> PR to the dplyr team to add this which they, after sitting on it for three
> weeks, now merged.)
>
> | On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:34 PM Qiang Kou <qkou at qkou.info> wrote:
> |
> | > Hi, Nicholas,
> | >
> | > First, what you reported is a known issue from boost [1], not Rcpp.
> | >
> | > Second, this issue has been fixed in boost 1.69 [2] and the bh package
>
> What is the issue again? I have BH 1.69 ready but cannot upload it as three
> packages regress so need to make time to write to their maintainers.
>
> Dirk
>
> --
> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rcpp-devel/attachments/20181217/3215711d/attachment.html>