[Rcpp-devel] Fwd: Is Rcpp:: not a good choice for iterators?

[FHRB Toledo]

Dear Dr. Eddelbuettel,

Thank you indeed regarding your interposition.

I am really sorry about my impolite reference about you and also about my
typo on your surname. It isn't my intention. I hope you can understand and
that this does not diminishes the relevance of my message.

As I have said in the last email, through Hao Ye's suggestion I figured out
ways to change the source and the results were much more reasonable.
Anyway, your overview on that, would be extremely valuable.

Kind Regards,
FH

On 11 August 2015 at 14:20, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:

>
> (off-list)
>
> On 11 August 2015 at 13:47, FHRB Toledo wrote:
> | P.S.: As I mentioned, I also will try the Eddelbuette's comment and asap
> report
>
> 1. For now the 2nd time, you omitted the final 'l'. Eddelbuettel.  Not
> Eddelbuette.
>
> 2. In English, it is not a very polite form to just refer to somebody's
> family name without any first name, title or other alliteration.  You may
> want to try a different form.
>
> Dirk
>
> --
> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rcpp-devel/attachments/20150811/695c5c13/attachment.html>