[Rcpp-devel] Package code industry request

[soeren.vogel at posteo.ch]

Good idea, Dirk, thanks for all notes and help.

Sören

> On 30.04.2015, at 13:15, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 30 April 2015 at 06:12, JJ Allaire wrote:
> | On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Sean O'Riordain <seoriord at tcd.ie> wrote:
> | > I am curious about the phrase "distribute internally" - surely under GPL,
> | > that is still distribution and all modifications should thus be made public?
> | > The GPL does not distinguish between "internal" distribution and any other
> | > kind.
> | >
> | 
> | Indeed it does:
> | https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic
> 
> Nice discussion all around, and I like how the GPL-2 emerged as a
> consensus. It's been my default license for 20-some years too.
> 
> But I think are not adding anyting new at this point (beyond maybe being new
> to Soren and Carlo).  There are _many_ places on the internet more focussed
> on this topic.  Maybe the discussion could move there?
> 
> Dirk
> 
> -- 
> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
> _______________________________________________
> Rcpp-devel mailing list
> Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel