[Rcpp-devel] How much speedup for matrix operations?
Romain Francois
romain at r-enthusiasts.com
Wed Nov 6 18:38:23 CET 2013
Le 06/11/2013 18:35, Xavier Robin a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have a pure-R code that spends most of the time performing vector and
> matrix operations, as shown by the summary of Rprof:
>> self.time self.pct total.time total.pct
>> "%*%" 903.24 77.67 903.24 77.67
>> "t.default" 76.26 6.56 76.26 6.56
>> "-" 36.60 3.15 36.60 3.15
>> "+" 24.44 2.10 24.44 2.10
>> "/" 24.22 2.08 24.22 2.08
>> "exp" 20.26 1.74 20.26 1.74
>> "predict.myClass" 17.68 1.52 503.82 43.32
>> "*" 11.90 1.02 11.90 1.02
>> "t" 9.38 0.81 811.94 69.82
>> "update.batch" 8.04 0.69 654.68 56.30
>> ...
> So mostly matrix %*% matrix multiplications, transpositions, vector +-/*
> matrix operations and exponentiations, representing >95% of the
> computation time.
> I have very few loops and if/else blocks.
>
> I want to speed up this code, and I am considering reimplementing it (or
> part of it) with RcppEigen or RcppArmadillo.
>
> However, I read that both Eigen and Amarillo use the underlying BLAS,
> like R.
> My question is, can I expect any significant speed-up from an Rcpp
> re-implementation in this case, given it is already mostly matrix
> algebra (which are supposed to be pretty efficient in R)?
>
> Thanks,
> Xavier
This very much depends on the code but there is a good chance that
RcppArmadillo will generate code making less data copies, etc ...
Hard to say without seeing the code.
Romain
--
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
More information about the Rcpp-devel
mailing list