[Rcpp-devel] pnorm/qnorm?
Rodney Sparapani
rsparapa at mcw.edu
Fri Sep 7 19:07:10 CEST 2012
On 09/07/2012 11:53 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> As a general, looking at the unit test files can be helpful. Here is one for qnorm:
>
> "runit_qnorm_prob" = list(
> signature( x = "numeric" ),
> '
> NumericVector xx(x) ;
> return List::create(_["lower"] = qnorm( xx, 0.0, 1.0 ),
> _["upper"] = qnorm( xx, 0.0, 1.0, false));
> ')
>
> Ie you can just call 'pnorm', 'qnorm', ...
>
> Dirk
Hi Dirk:
Well, I assumed as much. But, here's what I see...
str <- '
double a=as<double>(arg1), b=as<double>(arg2);
return wrap(qnorm(a, b, 1.));
'
check2 <- cxxfunction(signature(arg1="numeric", arg2="numeric"), str,
plugin="Rcpp")
#check2(0.5, 0.5)
33: return wrap(qnorm(a, b, 1.));
34:
35: END_RCPP
36: }
37:
38:
Error in compileCode(f, code, language = language, verbose = verbose) :
Compilation ERROR, function(s)/method(s) not created!
file33b64e743def.cpp: In function 'SEXPREC* file33b64e743def(SEXPREC*,
SEXPREC*)':
file33b64e743def.cpp:33: error: no matching function for call to
'qnorm5(double&, double&, double)'
make: *** [file33b64e743def.o] Error 1
In addition: Warning message:
running command '/opt/local/lib64/R/bin/R CMD SHLIB file33b64e743def.cpp
2> file33b64e743def.cpp.err.txt' had status 1
Am I doing something stupid? Thanks
--
Rodney Sparapani, PhD Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research
Sr. Biostatistician http://www.mcw.edu/pcor
4 wheels good, 2 wheels better! Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW)
WWLD?: What Would Lombardi Do? Milwaukee, WI, USA
More information about the Rcpp-devel
mailing list