[Rcpp-devel] broken package after udpate

[baptiste auguie]

I've tested my package with the latest Rcpp svn commit (3987) on r-forge
and that fixes it. I'm therefore keen to just wait for the next Rcpp
release; I'll write the CRAN maintainers to see what they want to do with
temporarily broken cda in the meantime.

Thanks again for the very responsive help,

baptiste




On 17 November 2012 13:13, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:

>
> On 17 November 2012 at 01:06, Romain Francois wrote:
> |
> | Le 17/11/12 00:59, baptiste auguie a écrit :
> | > I see, thanks a lot for tracking this down.
>
> Seconded -- nicely done.
>
> | > In practical terms, should I change all such functions to use SEXP +
> | > explicit wrap, or will you submit a new CRAN version soon enough fixing
> | > this?
> |
> | I don't know.
>
> We are doing _a lot_ of work on Rcpp right now, so I'd say we will have a
> new
> release sooner rather than later -- maybe in two or three weeks. But there
> is
> no guarantee.
>
> | > Personally I don't mind waiting a bit for the CRAN fix of cda;
> | > probably noone else uses my package and I'd rather avoid making
> | > unnecessary workaround fixes. That being said, I would be surprised if
> | > no other packages broke because of this.
> |
> | Well. We'll only know when people tell us I guess.
>
> With infinite time, we would have an infinite number of use cases. I think
> we
> have a simple case that test return of matrices, but (and I have not yet
> checked) the include order that Romain identified is of course not
> something
> we check.
>
> Cheers, Dirk
>
> --
> Dirk Eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rcpp-devel/attachments/20121117/c14f015b/attachment.html>