[Rcpp-devel] broken package after udpate
baptiste.auguie at gmail.com
Sat Nov 17 04:18:09 CET 2012
I've tested my package with the latest Rcpp svn commit (3987) on r-forge
and that fixes it. I'm therefore keen to just wait for the next Rcpp
release; I'll write the CRAN maintainers to see what they want to do with
temporarily broken cda in the meantime.
Thanks again for the very responsive help,
On 17 November 2012 13:13, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> On 17 November 2012 at 01:06, Romain Francois wrote:
> | Le 17/11/12 00:59, baptiste auguie a écrit :
> | > I see, thanks a lot for tracking this down.
> Seconded -- nicely done.
> | > In practical terms, should I change all such functions to use SEXP +
> | > explicit wrap, or will you submit a new CRAN version soon enough fixing
> | > this?
> | I don't know.
> We are doing _a lot_ of work on Rcpp right now, so I'd say we will have a
> release sooner rather than later -- maybe in two or three weeks. But there
> no guarantee.
> | > Personally I don't mind waiting a bit for the CRAN fix of cda;
> | > probably noone else uses my package and I'd rather avoid making
> | > unnecessary workaround fixes. That being said, I would be surprised if
> | > no other packages broke because of this.
> | Well. We'll only know when people tell us I guess.
> With infinite time, we would have an infinite number of use cases. I think
> have a simple case that test return of matrices, but (and I have not yet
> checked) the include order that Romain identified is of course not
> we check.
> Cheers, Dirk
> Dirk Eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rcpp-devel