[Rcpp-devel] Fwd: latest incompatible changes for package developers?

[baptiste auguie]

Hi Romain, Dirk, all,

Thanks for the quick replies. I think the list problem was due to a change
in my gmail address (from "googlemail"); still puzzling that I didn't get a
warning.

Hopefully someone can figure out why a function that returned an arma
matrix has now become a vector: I've posted a minimal package on dropbox,

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/352834/cda_1.2.1.tar.gz

with a test in inst/testing that used to return a 3x3 matrix (Euler
rotation), now a vector after the Rcpp update.


The lesson for me is that I should really get into a proper testing
framework. In the meantime, I'll be writing a few tests with Hadley's
testthat.

All the best,

baptiste


On 17 November 2012 11:20, Romain Francois <romain at r-enthusiasts.com> wrote:

> First time I see this email.
>
> Sorry your package does not work.
>
> R CMD check --no-vignettes worked. (this is how I tested), but indeed
> something in the vignette makes it crash. I guess I should check the
> vignettes too :/
>
> I get an error in demo(dimer_linear)
>
> regarding something that does not look like it is related to Rcpp, in this
> mdply call :
>
>     comparison <- mdply(params, onedimer, .progress="none")
>
> Not sure what the next steps are ...
>
> Romain
>
> Le 16/11/12 22:56, baptiste auguie a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Forwarded to you directly just in case it never makes it to the list for
>> whatever reason (shouldn't I get an error message if it it is bounced?)
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> baptiste
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: *baptiste auguie* <baptiste.auguie at gmail.com
>> <mailto:baptiste.auguie at gmail.**com <baptiste.auguie at gmail.com>>>
>> Date: 17 November 2012 09:29
>> Subject: Fwd: latest incompatible changes for package developers?
>> To: rcpp-devel <rcpp-devel at r-forge.wu-wien.**ac.at<rcpp-devel at r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at>
>> <mailto:rcpp-devel at r-forge.wu-**wien.ac.at<rcpp-devel at r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> Not sure what happened to this email I sent yesterday; I can't find it
>> in the list archives?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> b.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: *baptiste auguie* <baptiste.auguie at gmail.com
>> <mailto:baptiste.auguie at gmail.**com <baptiste.auguie at gmail.com>>>
>> Date: 16 November 2012 09:18
>> Subject: latest incompatible changes for package developers?
>> To: rcpp-devel <rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-**project.org<rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org>
>> <mailto:rcpp-devel at lists.r-**forge.r-project.org<rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I haven't yet had time to read much about the new exciting changes
>> introduced in Rcpp 0.10, but I got an email from B. Ripley this morning
>> warning me that my cda package* was broken as a result of this CRAN
>> update. It uses modules and RcppArmadillo.
>> Indeed, a quick glance at the broken demos after having updated the
>> package suggest that most if not all my functions are currently broken.
>> Is there a specific document I should read first to speed up this
>> recovery and be compatible with the new version? How much change should
>> I expect?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> All the best,
>>
>> baptiste
>>
>> * https://github.com/baptiste/**cda <https://github.com/baptiste/cda>
>> http://cran.r-project.org/web/**packages/cda/index.html<http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cda/index.html>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Romain Francois
> Professional R Enthusiast
> +33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
>
> R Graph Gallery: http://gallery.r-enthusiasts.**com<http://gallery.r-enthusiasts.com>
> `- http://bit.ly/SweN1Z : SuperStorm Sandy
>
> blog:            http://romainfrancois.blog.**free.fr<http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr>
> |- http://bit.ly/RE6sYH : OOP with Rcpp modules
> `- http://bit.ly/Thw7IK : Rcpp modules more flexible
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rcpp-devel/attachments/20121117/af2efc0a/attachment.html>