[Rcpp-devel] [Rd] R inline package

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

Hi Troy,

Glad to hear you're covered.

On 21 March 2012 at 07:45, Troy Robertson wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
| 
| It's okay.  I just created my own copy of the setCMethod and added the 
| missing ellipses to it's call to cfunction() and it works fine.
| It now passes on the Rcpp=TRUE and the cppargs and libargs and finds 
| both the Rcpp and my own library.

That's how we started too, prior to cxxfunction().

I am wondering if I could interest you in looking at the cxxfunction code
maybe thinking about extending to whichever form it takes to let you create
S4 methods that way. Any interest?

Cheers, Dirk

| 
| Troy
| 
| On 21/03/2012 12:19 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 19 March 2012 at 14:32, Troy Robertson wrote:
| > | Okay, after having a look at the source for the inline package, I see
| > | that ... arguments to setCMethod()
| > | are not passed on in its internal call to cfunction(), hence my cppargs
| > | and libargs (and indeed Rcpp=TRUE)
| > | are ignored?
| >
| > As I said before, we extended the inline package with cxxfunction() for use
| > with Rcpp et al, and essentially only use cxxfunction.
| >
| > As for S4 methods, there are some example tucked away in the unittests you
| > could look at.
| >
| > For the rest, I am not entirely clear as to what it is you want to do.  Maybe
| > Rcpp modules could help you, though it is closer to Reference Classes than to
| > S4 classes.
| >
| > Hoep this helps,  Dirk
| >

-- 
"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too
dark to read." -- Groucho Marx