[Rcpp-devel] RcppArmadillo: resize vs. insert_cols
conradsand.arma at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 14:48:36 CET 2012
Option (b) would be more efficient, at the expense of slightly more code.
However, you can use option (a) to quickly get something working. Once you
test that your code works okay, you can always optimise it by selectively
refactoring it into (b).
If the code in question is not inside a critical loop, you may not need to
bother with the refactoring. Eg. if most of the time is spent inside matrix
multiplication, or solve(), or svd(), etc, refactoring would make little
On Monday, December 10, 2012, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte <rdiaz02 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
> I am using RcppArmadillo, and I am creating matrices in the C++ code
> (i.e., these are not matrices passed from R). The sizes of these matrices
> might need to increase dynamically during run time, with elements being
> added at the end. What is the recommended way of doing this:
> a) Just insert elements as needed. E.g.: Y.insert_cols(Y.n_cols,
> b) Create initial object. Double size of object (using resize) each time I
> run out of space. Copy the_new_thing to the appropriate place.
> I thought b) was a reasonable manual approach (e.g., Skiena, "The
> algorithm design manual, 2nd ed", p. 67), but I think I've read that for
> std::vector, a) (with push_back), is a better choice than b) (using
> reserve, not resize).
> For me, a) involves writing less code.
> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
> Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25
> Facultad de Medicina
> Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
> Arzobispo Morcillo, 4
> 28029 Madrid
> Phone: +34-91-497-2412
> Email: rdiaz02 at gmail.com
> ramon.diaz at iib.uam.es
> Rcpp-devel mailing list
> Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rcpp-devel