[Rcpp-devel] Data Persistence when using inline

[Noah Silverman]

Awesome.

Thank You!

--
Noah Silverman
UCLA Department of Statistics
8117 Math Sciences Building #8208
Los Angeles, CA 90095

On Sep 7, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Noah Silverman wrote:

> Dirk,
> 
> Maybe I didn't explain it well enough.  The question absolutely pertains to using the inline functionality.
> 
> As each new data arrives, I want to pass it to my C++ function.  If this were a pure C++ implementation, then I would just append an STL vector and pass a pointer of that vector to the function.  However, since this is R, I don't see how to do that.  I can, of course, keep a vector in R and pass the entire vector to the C++ function. That will, however slow things down significantly.
> 
> Ultimately, I'dl like to have R pass each new data point to the C++ function, and have that function manage keeping the appropriate length window of past data points. (Again, trivial to do in pure C++).
> 
> This really is an issue of persistent object and passing between R and C++.  I want a persistent C++ vector, not an R data structure.  (Having C++ manage the vector will be much faster.)
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Noah Silverman
> UCLA Department of Statistics
> 8117 Math Sciences Building #8208
> Los Angeles, CA 90095
> 
> On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 7 September 2011 at 14:46, Noah Silverman wrote:
>> | Hi,
>> | 
>> | 
>> | I'm writing a function using Rcpp through inline.  This function will be a
>> | filter on an incoming data stream.  
>> | 
>> | I need to keep the past several data values so that they are accessible to the
>> | function each time it is called.   This is easy to do with a data structure in
>> | R (and then passing subsequent structure to the C++ function) but that seems
>> | rather slow.  Is there some way to define a persistent object that is
>> | accessible to an Inline function using Rcpp?
>> | 
>> | 
>> | If the code was in pure C++, it would be trivial to have an object and then
>> | just pass a pointer to that object.  I can't figure out how to do the same
>> | thing with R+Rcpp+inline.
>> 
>> i)   Read up on the 'static' argument for variable declarations in C and C++.
>> 
>> ii)  Rethink your architecture, maybe have an 'agent' operate on the stream
>>     and report to a persisting 'broker' that keeps state.
>> 
>> iii) Read up on persisting data as a general issue.
>> 
>> 
>> This has little to do with Rcpp and your preference of inline over packages,
>> but rather with how to think in code (and/or C++) and that is NOT a topic
>> covered on this list.  
>> 
>> Let's please try to keep focus on Rcpp and related questions here.
>> 
>> Dirk
>> 
>> 
>> | Thanks!
>> | 
>> | --
>> | Noah Silverman
>> | UCLA Department of Statistics
>> | 8117 Math Sciences Building #8208
>> | Los Angeles, CA 90095
>> | 
>> | 
>> | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> | _______________________________________________
>> | Rcpp-devel mailing list
>> | Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
>> | https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
>> -- 
>> Two new Rcpp master classes for R and C++ integration scheduled for 
>> New York (Sep 24) and San Francisco (Oct 8), more details are at
>> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/2011/08/04#rcpp_classes_2011-09_and_2011-10
>> http://www.revolutionanalytics.com/products/training/public/rcpp-master-class.php
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rcpp-devel mailing list
> Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rcpp-devel/attachments/20110907/18e8cb49/attachment-0001.htm>