[Rcpp-devel] Error: .onLoad failed in loadNamespace()
Romain Francois
romain at r-enthusiasts.com
Mon May 30 21:58:48 CEST 2011
Le 28/05/11 04:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
>
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On 27 May 2011 at 17:17, Laurent Gatto wrote:
> | Dear all,
> |
> | A basic packages with Rcpp modules produces the warning described
> | below, that I would ideally, with your help, get rid of.
> |
> | Rscript -e "require(Rcpp); Rcpp.package.skeleton(module=FALSE)"
> | R CMD check anRpackage
> |
> | produces obvious warnings related to badly formatted documentation and
> | license. However
> |
> | Rscript -e "require(Rcpp); Rcpp.package.skeleton(module=TRUE)"
> | R CMD check anRpackage
> |
> | produces this additional warning that puzzles me:
> |
> | [ ...checker output... ]
> | * checking whether the name space can be loaded with stated
> | dependencies ... WARNING
> | Error: .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for ‘anRpackage’, details:
> | call: value[[3L]](cond)
> | error: failed to load module yada from package anRpackage
> | Execution halted
> |
> | A namespace must be able to be loaded with just the base namespace
> | loaded: otherwise if the namespace gets loaded by a saved object, the
> | session will be unable to start.
> |
> | Probably some imports need to be declared in the NAMESPACE file.
> | [ ...checker output...]
> |
> | I suspect this may be related to the yada module not being exposed and
> | thus not available when the package is loaded. Any further explanation
> | or hints would however be warmly appreciated.
>
> I think you are pretty close. As I recall, this 'warning' has been a bit of a
> wart that won't quite go away. I just checked again what we do in the unit
> tests in file runit.Module.client.package.R: we build a package (ie create a
> tar.gz) and then install from it. That also triggers the warning, but passes
> it.
>
> Romain may have more details about how this is related to module
> initialization and startup.
>
> Dirk
I'll have a go at installing a fresher R-devel and see what the next
move is. My guess is that R checks are tighter now.
> |
> | sessionInfo() is appended below.
> |
> | Thank you very much in advance.
> |
> | Best wishes,
> |
> | Laurent
> |
> |
> |> sessionInfo()
> | R version 2.14.0 Under development (unstable) (2011-05-04 r55760)
> | Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit)
> |
> | locale:
> | [1] LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 LC_NUMERIC=C
> | [3] LC_TIME=en_GB.utf8 LC_COLLATE=en_GB.utf8
> | [5] LC_MONETARY=C LC_MESSAGES=en_GB.utf8
> | [7] LC_PAPER=en_GB.utf8 LC_NAME=C
> | [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
> | [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_GB.utf8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
> |
> | attached base packages:
> | [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
> |
> | other attached packages:
> | [1] Rcpp_0.9.4.1
--
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr
http://romain-francois.com
|- http://bit.ly/hdKhCy : Rcpp article in JSS
|- http://bit.ly/elZJRJ : Montpellier Comedie Club - Avril 2011
`- http://bit.ly/fhqbRC : Rcpp workshop in Chicago on April 28th
More information about the Rcpp-devel
mailing list