[Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp for OS X on CRAN [Was: Building/linking trouble with cxxfunction()]

Simon Urbanek simon.urbanek at r-project.org
Wed Feb 23 00:56:20 CET 2011


On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:28 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

> 
> Ken,
> 
> Could you test the 0.9.1 tarball?  Then in
> inst/unitTests/runit.Module.client.package.R, apply the diff below:
> 
>  -- ie add the new .badOSX function (maybe I'll rename it 'oldOSX')
> 

You have a typo in the call (.basOSX vs .badOSX) and you got the test all wrong -- you're testing for anything but Darwin and you have the versions wrong (only major matters and "bad" is anything below 10). Why don't you just use my code ? ;) You can just copy my condition in verbatim just after Rcpp:::capabilities()[["Rcpp modules"]] && - it was designed that way ...

Cheers,
S


>  -- change the test to add a   && ! .badOSX()   
> 
> so that the test that barfs under g++ 4.2.1 is not getting run.
> 
> If that passes everything, yet failed before, we would have ourselves a new
> version which may things better.
> 
> Dirk
> 
> 
> Index: runit.Module.client.package.R
> ===================================================================
> --- runit.Module.client.package.R	(revision 2902)
> +++ runit.Module.client.package.R	(working copy)
> @@ -22,8 +22,18 @@
> 	gc()
> }
> 
> -if( Rcpp:::capabilities()[["Rcpp modules"]] ) {
> +.badOSX <- function() {                 		# the unit test in this file fails on OS X 10.5
> +    val <- FALSE                            	# assume we are not on an old OS X
> +    if (Sys.info()['sysname'] != "Darwin") {    # if on Darwin, let's test
> +        vertxt <- Sys.info()['release'] 		# 10.5.0 or 10.6.0 or ....
> +        osx <- as.numeric(strsplit(vertxt, "\\.")[[1]])
> +        val <- osx[1] == 10 && osx[2] <= 5 		# 10 and le 5 will mark as bad
> +    }
> +    val
> +}
> 
> +if( Rcpp:::capabilities()[["Rcpp modules"]] && ! .basOSX() ) {
> +
> test.Module.package <- function( ){
> 
>     td <- tempfile()
> 
> On 22 February 2011 at 16:58, Ken.Williams at thomsonreuters.com wrote:
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | On 2/22/11 4:54 PM, "Dirk Eddelbuettel" <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> | 
> | >What is in Sys.info(), particularly fields 1 and 2:
> | >
> | >R> Sys.info()[1:2]
> | >            sysname             release
> | >            "Linux" "2.6.32-25-generic"
> | 
> | That's probably the right way to do it, as Simon suggested too in the
> | meantime.
> | 
> | > Sys.info()[1:2]
> |  sysname  release 
> | "Darwin" "10.6.0" 
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | > 
> | >
> | >Else, .Platform() starts with 'Darwin', right?
> | 
> | Nope: 
> | 
> | > .Platform[1]
> | $OS.type
> | [1] "unix"
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | --
> | Ken Williams
> | Senior Research Scientist
> | Thomson Reuters
> | http://labs.thomsonreuters.com
> | 
> | 
> 
> -- 
> Dirk Eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com
> 
> 



More information about the Rcpp-devel mailing list