[Rcpp-devel] integer arrays as arguments for a module function
Chris DuBois
chris.dubois at gmail.com
Sat Aug 13 09:52:01 CEST 2011
I didn't find anything too relevant in the unit tests. I got a bit stuck,
and asked a question on StackOverflow here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7048888/stdvectorstdstring-to-char-array
.
One answer seemed particularly promising (as shown by the working demo:
http://ideone.com/U6QZ5 ).
However, when I put this code into a module, I get an error:
error: argument of type ‘char* (Foo::)(const std::string&)’ does not match
‘char* (Foo::*)(const std::basic_string<char>&)’
Here's the example I'm working with. Commenting out the std::transform and
it compiles fine. Why does it work OK when not in a module, but fails when
in a module?
R code:
inc <- paste(readLines('tests/convertCharExample.txt.cpp'),collapse="\n")
fx <- cxxfunction( signature(), "" , include = inc, plugin = "Rcpp" )
a <- Module( "foo_mod", getDynLib(fx) )
b <- new(a$Foo,1:5)
b$convertExample()
convertCharExample.txt.cpp code:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator>
#include <cstring>
class Foo {
public:
Foo(IntegerVector tail) {
this->tail = tail;
}
char *convert(const std::string & s)
{
char *pc = new char[s.size()+1];
std::strcpy(pc, s.c_str());
return pc;
}
int convertExample() {
std::vector<std::string> vs;
vs.push_back("std::string");
vs.push_back("std::vector<std::string>");
vs.push_back("char*");
vs.push_back("std::vector<char*>");
std::vector<char*> vc;
std::transform(vs.begin(), vs.end(), std::back_inserter(vc),
convert);
for ( size_t i = 0 ; i < vc.size() ; i++ )
std::cout << vc[i] << std::endl;
for ( size_t i = 0 ; i < vc.size() ; i++ )
delete [] vc[i];
return 0;
}
private:
IntegerVector tail;
};
RCPP_MODULE(foo_mod){
using namespace Rcpp ;
class_<Foo>( "Foo" )
.constructor<IntegerVector>()
.method( "convertExample", &Foo::convertExample ,"")
;
}
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
>
> On 12 August 2011 at 16:59, Chris DuBois wrote:
> | Point taken: STL looks like the way to go in general.
> |
> | In my particular example, however, the arrays get immediately cast to
> another
> | structure foo (somebody else's code). So I need to cast from
> IntegerVector to
> | int[] before they get cast to foo[]. What you suggested works perfectly
> (and
> | makes sense in hindsight).
> |
> | Is the story identical for char[]? Where x is a CharacterVector, I
> tried
> |
> | char* a = x.begin();
> |
> | and got
> | error: cannot convert ‘Rcpp::Vector<16>::iterator’ to ‘char*’ in
> | assignment
>
> char can be a pain. It is something C and C++ didn't get quite right by
> lacking a base type for string. Doing it in plain C (as in *argv[] from
> main()) is a pain but doable.
>
> CharacterVector works as the equivalent of std::vector< std::string >. Out
> of
> each element (ie string) you can extract the underlying char* but you may
> have to rely on strcmp etc. Remember that you may be dealing with pointers
> of pointers...
>
> Have a peek at the unitTests/ directory to see if you find something.
>
> Hope this helps, Dirk
>
> | Any help much appreciated.
> | Chris
> |
> | On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>
> wrote:
> |
> |
> | On 12 August 2011 at 14:50, Chris DuBois wrote:
> | | Hi all,
> | |
> | | I'm trying to figure out how to pass in an array of integers to a
> | function
> | | inside a module. For example, adding the following function to
> | runit.Module.R
> | | works fine:
> | |
> | | int bla3( IntegerVector x ) {
> | | return sum(x);
> | | }
> | |
> | | However, I need to pass an int array, rather than an IntegerVector.
> | Using int
> | | x[] in the arguments doesn't compile (though I'm unfamiliar with
> C++ in
> | | general, so maybe this shouldn't work anyway).
> | |
> | | Alternatively, should I just cast x from an IntegerVector to an int
> | array? I
> | | tried various permutations of as, vector, <int>, etc, and would
> like to
> | learn
> | | the proper way of doing this.
> |
> | You generally do not want old school x[] arrays in C++. Why? Because
> STL
> | vectors do _everything_ they do at (essentially) zero added cost,
> free you
> | from malloc/free and still allow you to access the straight memory
> should
> | you
> | need to (to talk to a C API, say).
> |
> | So use IntegerVector for _the interface_. You can the, if you must,
> do
> |
> | IntegerVector x;
> |
> | int a1[] = x.begin(); // STL-style iterator to beginning of
> | memory
> | int *a2 = x.begin(); // idem
> |
> | Hope this helps, Dirk
> |
> | --
> | Two new Rcpp master classes for R and C++ integration scheduled for
> | New York (Sep 24) and San Francisco (Oct 8), more details are at
> | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/2011/08/04#
> | rcpp_classes_2011-09_and_2011-10
> | http://www.revolutionanalytics.com/products/training/public/
> | rcpp-master-class.php
> |
> |
>
> --
> Two new Rcpp master classes for R and C++ integration scheduled for
> New York (Sep 24) and San Francisco (Oct 8), more details are at
>
> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/2011/08/04#rcpp_classes_2011-09_and_2011-10
>
> http://www.revolutionanalytics.com/products/training/public/rcpp-master-class.php
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rcpp-devel/attachments/20110813/73ce0698/attachment.htm>
More information about the Rcpp-devel
mailing list