[Rcpp-devel] Sugar

Dominick Samperi djsamperi at gmail.com
Mon Nov 1 06:13:19 CET 2010


Comments on Sugar...

Rcpp sugar seems to be an enhancement for C++ more than an interface
function,
so wouldn't it make sense to maintain it as a separate C++ class library?
More generally, it would be useful to know what portions of Rcpp can
function without the R engine running. This can be determined by
trial and error, but it might be helpful if the boundary was more
clearly defined. Another possible advantage is clients could link only
against code that they really need.

Thanks,
Dominick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rcpp-devel/attachments/20101101/244a9e4f/attachment.htm>


More information about the Rcpp-devel mailing list