[Rcpp-devel] bug hunting

Romain Francois romain.francois at dbmail.com
Tue Mar 23 19:29:03 CET 2010


Le 23/03/10 16:04, Douglas Bates a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel<edd at debian.org>  wrote:
>>
>> On 23 March 2010 at 13:16, Romain Francois wrote:
>> | Le 23/03/10 12:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
>> |>
>> |>  FYI, following Doug's lead re '-pedantic', I made that permanent for me via
>> |>
>> |>       edd at ron:~$ grep pedantic .R/*
>> |>       .R/Makevars:CFLAGS=-g -O3 -Wall -pipe -pedantic
>> |>       .R/Makevars:CXXFLAGS=-g -O3 -Wall -pipe -pedantic
>> |>
>> |>  which now reveals a lot of
>> |>
>> |>       ./RcppCommon.h:205:28: warning: anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99
>> |
>> | We can kill this one with the -Wno-variadic-macros flag
>>
>> Hmpf. Not great.
>>
>> |>  as well as
>> |>
>> |>       from Promise.cpp:22:
>> |>       ./Rcpp/Vector.h:434:30: warning: ISO C99 requires rest arguments to be used
>> |>       ./Rcpp/Vector.h:441:29: warning: ISO C99 requires rest arguments to be used
>> |>       ./Rcpp/Vector.h:477:26: warning: ISO C99 requires rest arguments to be used
>> |>       ./Rcpp/Vector.h:482:30: warning: ISO C99 requires rest arguments to be used
>> |>       ./Rcpp/Vector.h:496:31: warning: ISO C99 requires rest arguments to be used
>> |
>> | This one, I'm not sure. Any ideas ?
>>
>> #ifdef protect your DEBUG macro that triggers is?
>
> Those are the cases where RCPP_DEBUG is being called with a format
> string only.  The message seems to indicate that there should be at
> least one other argument in the ... list, even if it is not used.  I
> got rid of the warnings by appending ", 0" to the format string when
> it appears alone.  I would check in the modified file except that
> emacs has changed the indentation on all the lines that I changed and
> I can't easily recover the original indentation.

Thanks for this. I commited it earlier.

For future reference, I don't mind if you reindent the code to suit 
emacs, I'm used to Dirk doing it.

Does that mean I should use "soft tabs" (emulated with spaces) ?

-- 
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr
|- http://tr.im/OIXN : raster images and RImageJ
|- http://tr.im/OcQe : Rcpp 0.7.7
`- http://tr.im/O1wO : highlight 0.1-5




More information about the Rcpp-devel mailing list