[Rcpp-devel] Rcpp-devel Digest, Vol 14, Issue 25

[Christian Gunning]

> It is useful if you actually send us what you  tried to compile, hoiw it
> failed, why you though it would work, etc ...

Sorry.  My primary goal for the night was the doc; by the end, I
wasn't sure which were the useful reject attempts. I'll try to be more
specific in the future.

> You cannot have missing arguments "in the middle" in C++.

I'll meditate on this.

The sugar is always in the first position for the stats functions, correct?

best,
xian