[Rcpp-devel] Rcpp-devel Digest, Vol 14, Issue 25
xian at unm.edu
Tue Dec 7 14:11:43 CET 2010
> It is useful if you actually send us what you tried to compile, hoiw it
> failed, why you though it would work, etc ...
Sorry. My primary goal for the night was the doc; by the end, I
wasn't sure which were the useful reject attempts. I'll try to be more
specific in the future.
> You cannot have missing arguments "in the middle" in C++.
I'll meditate on this.
The sugar is always in the first position for the stats functions, correct?
More information about the Rcpp-devel