[Rcpp-commits] r1487 - pkg/Rcpp/inst/doc/Rcpp-FAQ
noreply at r-forge.r-project.org
noreply at r-forge.r-project.org
Tue Jun 8 09:34:28 CEST 2010
Author: romain
Date: 2010-06-08 09:34:28 +0200 (Tue, 08 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 1487
Modified:
pkg/Rcpp/inst/doc/Rcpp-FAQ/Rcpp-FAQ.Rnw
Log:
few more words in FAQ
Modified: pkg/Rcpp/inst/doc/Rcpp-FAQ/Rcpp-FAQ.Rnw
===================================================================
--- pkg/Rcpp/inst/doc/Rcpp-FAQ/Rcpp-FAQ.Rnw 2010-06-08 02:33:31 UTC (rev 1486)
+++ pkg/Rcpp/inst/doc/Rcpp-FAQ/Rcpp-FAQ.Rnw 2010-06-08 07:34:28 UTC (rev 1487)
@@ -291,6 +291,14 @@
\href{http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/code/rcpp/rcpp-doc-latex.zip}{latex}, and
\href{http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/code/rcpp/rcpp-doc-man.zip}{man}.
+\subsection{Does it work ?}
+
+We take quality seriously and have developped an extensive unit test suite to
+cover many possible uses of the \pkg{Rcpp} API.
+
+We are always on the look for more coverage in our testing. Please let us know
+if something has not been tested enough.
+
\section{Support}
\subsection{Where can I ask further questions ?}
@@ -307,13 +315,19 @@
to study patches and incorporate them in \pkg{Rcpp}.
You can also spread the word about \pkg{Rcpp}. There are many packages on CRAN
-that use \proglang{C++}, yet are not using \pkg{Rcpp}.
+that use \proglang{C++}, yet are not using \pkg{Rcpp}. You can write a
+review of \pkg{Rcpp} in \href{http://crantastic.org}{crantastic}.
\subsection{I don't like it. How can I help ?}
It is very generous of you to still want to help. Perhaps you can tell us
what it is that you dislike. We are very open to \emph{constructive} criticism.
+\subsection{Can I have commercial support for \pkg{Rcpp} ?}
+
+Sure you can. Just send us an email, we'll be happy to either deal with the
+request or redirect it.
+
\bibliographystyle{abbrvnat}
\bibliography{Rcpp}
More information about the Rcpp-commits
mailing list