[Rcpp-commits] r606 - papers/rjournal
noreply at r-forge.r-project.org
noreply at r-forge.r-project.org
Sat Feb 6 17:34:30 CET 2010
Author: edd
Date: 2010-02-06 17:34:30 +0100 (Sat, 06 Feb 2010)
New Revision: 606
Modified:
papers/rjournal/EddelbuettelFrancois.tex
Log:
and a few more minor changes
Modified: papers/rjournal/EddelbuettelFrancois.tex
===================================================================
--- papers/rjournal/EddelbuettelFrancois.tex 2010-02-06 16:31:48 UTC (rev 605)
+++ papers/rjournal/EddelbuettelFrancois.tex 2010-02-06 16:34:30 UTC (rev 606)
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@
% example ?
% [Dirk] We're running out of space. In the JSS piece...
-\section{Performance and Limitations}
+\section{Performance comparison}
In this section, we illustrate how C++ features may well come with a price
in terms of performance. However, as users of \pkg{Rcpp}, we do not need to
@@ -676,7 +676,6 @@
the best of both worlds. The classic \pkg{Rcpp} translation of the convolve example from
\cite{R:exts} appears twice above where the second example showed the use
with the new API.
-% [Dirk] Seemingly, no \ref with the RJournal style
The implementation of the \code{operator[]} is designed as
efficiently as possible, using both inlining and caching,
@@ -727,8 +726,8 @@
\begin{small}
\begin{tabular}{lrr}
\toprule
- \textbf{Method} & \textbf{Time} & Relative \\
- & (millisec) & to R API \\
+ Implementation & Time in & Relative \\
+ & millisec & to R API \\
\cmidrule(r){2-3}
R API (as benchmark) & 32 & \\
\code{RcppVector<double>} & 354 & 11.1 \\
More information about the Rcpp-commits
mailing list