[Phylobase-devl] CRAN release
Jim Regetz
regetz at nceas.ucsb.edu
Tue Oct 27 01:42:27 CET 2009
Releasing sounds like a great idea to me! I absolute agree about having
more eyes to uncover issues and such. Also, expanding the pool of folks
who use and build on phylobase should be a positive force for setting
development priorities.
FYI, earlier today we discovered a problem with src/*.c files not being
compiled during the Windows build process. I believe it was caused by an
overly aggressive Makefile.win (created specifically for the ncl code),
and have my fingers crossed that the switch to a Makevars.win will do
the trick. It now builds properly for me on an XP VM with the Windows
toolset, and I'll check to see how it fares during the next R-forge
build/check cycle.
Jim
Peter Cowan wrote:
> I suggest we do a beta release of phylobase to CRAN. We seem to have
> tackled most of the architectural issues and bugs that we wanted to.
> This and a lack of time has caused development to be notably slower
> over the last month.
>
> To the best of my knowledge all planned but unimplmented code, falls
> into the category of enhancements that would not break code produced
> w/ the current version.
>
> I think there would be great value in getting the package out to a
> wider audience (just this week I was asked how to do things in ape
> that are trivial w/ phylobase). More eyes will make bugs and gaps in
> the documentation more obvious. Furthermore, package developers will
> shy away from phylobase until it is available to them on CRAN.
>
> R-core has also just released 2.10.0 (which should make some mac
> issues a bit better.)
>
> Any objections?
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Phylobase-devl mailing list
> Phylobase-devl at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/phylobase-devl
More information about the Phylobase-devl
mailing list