[GSoC-PortA] Quick question on multipliers and constrained_objective()
Brian G. Peterson
brian at braverock.com
Sat Jun 22 05:55:19 CEST 2013
On 06/21/2013 10:44 PM, Doug Martin wrote:
> Small comment: a lot (if not most) literature on risk takes risk as a
> positive number, so puts a minus sign on the VaR quantile, etc. I
> previously noticed that PerformanceAnalytics takes risk as negative, had the
> thought to change that.
PerformanceAnalytics allows it either way, user's choice.
Risk is risk of *loss*. Period.
Now, the math is sometimes/often easier with a positive number, I admit,
but it's typical for risk reports on real portfolios to describe those
risks as negative numbers.
So we allow either.
Cheers,
Brian
--
Brian G. Peterson
http://braverock.com/brian/
Ph: 773-459-4973
IM: bgpbraverock
More information about the GSoC-PortA
mailing list