[Gsoc-dowd] Entering "pencils-down"

Dinesh Acharya dines.acharya at gmail.com
Wed Aug 19 03:11:32 CEST 2015


I am not sure how this works, but if I am correct after release to CRAN,
the errors if reported will be addressed to maintainer field. I will be
very happy to solve those. However, it might be better for you to be aware
of that as well. Is there anyway that can (/will) be achieved.

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:47 AM, Dinesh Acharya <dines.acharya at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ok, I will do accordingly.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Peter Carl <peter at braverock.com> wrote:
>
>> Dinesh,
>>
>> Looks like you've hit your target - I count 147 functions committed
>> against 147 functions in your plan.
>>
>> Check looks good - I see one warning that might mean you forgot to check
>> in an Rd file:
>> * checking Rd \usage sections ... WARNING
>> Undocumented arguments in documentation object 'NormalESHotspots'
>>   'skew' 'kurtosis'
>>
>> With a clean check in hand, a full set of functionality and a few days in
>> 'pencils-down' mode, how do you want to wrap up?  Let me suggest that you
>> submit this to CRAN for broader distribution, and write up some notes for
>> what you would like to do from here...  Any other thoughts?
>>
>> pcc
>> _______________________________________________
>> GSoC-Dowd mailing list
>> GSoC-Dowd at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
>> http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gsoc-dowd
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/gsoc-dowd/attachments/20150819/75a127a3/attachment.html>


More information about the GSoC-Dowd mailing list