[Genabel-commits] r1917 - www

noreply at r-forge.r-project.org noreply at r-forge.r-project.org
Mon Jan 19 11:02:12 CET 2015


Author: lckarssen
Date: 2015-01-19 11:02:11 +0100 (Mon, 19 Jan 2015)
New Revision: 1917

Modified:
   www/packageReviewGuidelines.html
   www/packageReviewGuidelines.org
Log:
Rephrased two entries in the package review guidelines.


Modified: www/packageReviewGuidelines.html
===================================================================
--- www/packageReviewGuidelines.html	2015-01-18 22:16:15 UTC (rev 1916)
+++ www/packageReviewGuidelines.html	2015-01-19 10:02:11 UTC (rev 1917)
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
 <head>
 <title>GenABEL Project Package Review Guidelines</title>
-<!-- 2014-10-30 do 12:18 -->
+<!-- 2015-01-19 ma 11:00 -->
 <meta  http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
 <meta  name="generator" content="Org-mode" />
 <meta  name="author" content="Y. Aulchenko, L.C. Karssen" />
@@ -168,11 +168,11 @@
 </li>
 <li><a href="#sec-4">4. Content</a>
 <ul>
-<li><a href="#sec-4-1">4.1. Does the package address the problem in the domain of statistical genomics?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#sec-4-1">4.1. Does the package address a problem in the domain of statistical genomics?</a></li>
 <li><a href="#sec-4-2">4.2. Is it streamlining analyses not covered elsewhere in the GenABEL suite? If not, does it improve the analysis already covered?</a></li>
 <li><a href="#sec-4-3">4.3. Should it become a separate package or rather be incorporated into an existing package?</a></li>
-<li><a href="#sec-4-4">4.4. Are any of the data types defined in other GenABEL packages used?</a></li>
-<li><a href="#sec-4-5">4.5. Are code/functions/data defined in other GenABEL packages used?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#sec-4-4">4.4. Does the package use any of the data types defined in other GenABEL packages?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#sec-4-5">4.5. Does the package use code/functions/data defined in other GenABEL packages?</a></li>
 </ul>
 </li>
 <li><a href="#sec-5">5. Suggestions</a>
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@
 <h2 id="sec-4"><span class="section-number-2">4</span> Content</h2>
 <div class="outline-text-2" id="text-4">
 </div><div id="outline-container-sec-4-1" class="outline-3">
-<h3 id="sec-4-1"><span class="section-number-3">4.1</span> Does the package address the problem in the domain of statistical genomics?</h3>
+<h3 id="sec-4-1"><span class="section-number-3">4.1</span> Does the package address a problem in the domain of statistical genomics?</h3>
 </div>
 <div id="outline-container-sec-4-2" class="outline-3">
 <h3 id="sec-4-2"><span class="section-number-3">4.2</span> Is it streamlining analyses not covered elsewhere in the GenABEL suite? If not, does it improve the analysis already covered?</h3>
@@ -306,10 +306,10 @@
 <h3 id="sec-4-3"><span class="section-number-3">4.3</span> Should it become a separate package or rather be incorporated into an existing package?</h3>
 </div>
 <div id="outline-container-sec-4-4" class="outline-3">
-<h3 id="sec-4-4"><span class="section-number-3">4.4</span> Are any of the data types defined in other GenABEL packages used?</h3>
+<h3 id="sec-4-4"><span class="section-number-3">4.4</span> Does the package use any of the data types defined in other GenABEL packages?</h3>
 </div>
 <div id="outline-container-sec-4-5" class="outline-3">
-<h3 id="sec-4-5"><span class="section-number-3">4.5</span> Are code/functions/data defined in other GenABEL packages used?</h3>
+<h3 id="sec-4-5"><span class="section-number-3">4.5</span> Does the package use code/functions/data defined in other GenABEL packages?</h3>
 </div>
 </div>
 
@@ -325,9 +325,9 @@
 </div>
 </div>
 <div id="postamble" class="status">
-<p class="date">Date: <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span class="timestamp"><2014-04-26 za></span></span></p>
+<p class="date">Date: <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span class="timestamp"><2015-01-14 wo></span></span></p>
 <p class="author">Author: Y. Aulchenko, L.C. Karssen</p>
-<p class="date">Created: 2014-10-30 do 12:18</p>
+<p class="date">Created: 2015-01-19 ma 11:00</p>
 <p class="creator">Emacs 24.3.1 (Org mode 8.2.4)</p>
 <p class="validation"><a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer">Validate</a></p>
 </div>

Modified: www/packageReviewGuidelines.org
===================================================================
--- www/packageReviewGuidelines.org	2015-01-18 22:16:15 UTC (rev 1916)
+++ www/packageReviewGuidelines.org	2015-01-19 10:02:11 UTC (rev 1917)
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 #+TITLE: GenABEL Project Package Review Guidelines
-#+DATE: <2014-04-26 za>
+#+DATE: <2015-01-14 wo>
 #+AUTHOR: Y. Aulchenko, L.C. Karssen
 #+EMAIL: lennart at karssen.org
 #+OPTIONS: ':nil *:t -:t ::t <:t H:3 \n:nil ^:t arch:headline
@@ -63,11 +63,11 @@
 ** Does the code contain explanatory comments?
 ** Were the design and methods implemented in package discussed during the development process (e.g. on the genabel-devel mailing list)?
 * Content
-** Does the package address the problem in the domain of statistical genomics?
+** Does the package address a problem in the domain of statistical genomics?
 ** Is it streamlining analyses not covered elsewhere in the GenABEL suite? If not, does it improve the analysis already covered?
 ** Should it become a separate package or rather be incorporated into an existing package?
-** Are any of the data types defined in other GenABEL packages used?
-** Are code/functions/data defined in other GenABEL packages used?
+** Does the package use any of the data types defined in other GenABEL packages?
+** Does the package use code/functions/data defined in other GenABEL packages?
 * Suggestions
 ** What are the major issues which should be addressed?
 ** What other (optional) suggestions you could make to the author?



More information about the Genabel-commits mailing list