[Genabel-commits] r1876 - www

Thu Oct 30 12:19:41 CET 2014

Author: lckarssen
Date: 2014-10-30 12:19:40 +0100 (Thu, 30 Oct 2014)
New Revision: 1876

Modified:
   www/packageReviewGuidelines.html
   www/packageReviewGuidelines.org
Log:
Minor updates to the packageReviewGuidelines:
- Added question about copyright holder
- Corrected my e-mail address
- Fixed typo


Modified: www/packageReviewGuidelines.html
===================================================================

--- www/packageReviewGuidelines.html	2014-10-29 22:11:48 UTC (rev 1875)
+++ www/packageReviewGuidelines.html	2014-10-30 11:19:40 UTC (rev 1876)
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
 <head>
 <title>GenABEL Project Package Review Guidelines</title>
-<!-- 2014-04-30 wo 10:52 -->
+<!-- 2014-10-30 do 12:18 -->
 <meta  http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
 <meta  name="generator" content="Org-mode" />
 <meta  name="author" content="Y. Aulchenko, L.C. Karssen" />
@@ -143,8 +143,9 @@
 <li><a href="#sec-1">1. Introduction</a></li>
 <li><a href="#sec-2">2. Legal issues</a>
 <ul>
-<li><a href="#sec-2-1">2.1. Is there a clear (standard) license?</a></li>
-<li><a href="#sec-2-2">2.2. Is the license GNU GPL-compatible?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#sec-2-1">2.1. Is the copyright holder clearly mentioned?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#sec-2-2">2.2. Is there a clear (standard) license?</a></li>
+<li><a href="#sec-2-3">2.3. Is the license GNU GPL-compatible?</a></li>
 </ul>
 </li>
 <li><a href="#sec-3">3. Technical quality</a>
@@ -227,7 +228,7 @@
 
 <p>
 Note that our coding style closely follows the Google style guide and
-is documented at <a href="codingstyle.html">here</a>.
+is documented <a href="codingstyle.html">here</a>.
 </p>
 </div>
 </div>
@@ -235,12 +236,15 @@
 <h2 id="sec-2"><span class="section-number-2">2</span> Legal issues</h2>
 <div class="outline-text-2" id="text-2">
 </div><div id="outline-container-sec-2-1" class="outline-3">
-<h3 id="sec-2-1"><span class="section-number-3">2.1</span> Is there a clear (standard) license?</h3>
+<h3 id="sec-2-1"><span class="section-number-3">2.1</span> Is the copyright holder clearly mentioned?</h3>
 </div>
 <div id="outline-container-sec-2-2" class="outline-3">
-<h3 id="sec-2-2"><span class="section-number-3">2.2</span> Is the license GNU GPL-compatible?</h3>
+<h3 id="sec-2-2"><span class="section-number-3">2.2</span> Is there a clear (standard) license?</h3>
 </div>
+<div id="outline-container-sec-2-3" class="outline-3">
+<h3 id="sec-2-3"><span class="section-number-3">2.3</span> Is the license GNU GPL-compatible?</h3>
 </div>
+</div>
 
 <div id="outline-container-sec-3" class="outline-2">
 <h2 id="sec-3"><span class="section-number-2">3</span> Technical quality</h2>
@@ -323,7 +327,7 @@
 <div id="postamble" class="status">
 <p class="date">Date: <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span class="timestamp"><2014-04-26 za></span></span></p>
 <p class="author">Author: Y. Aulchenko, L.C. Karssen</p>
-<p class="date">Created: 2014-04-30 wo 10:52</p>
+<p class="date">Created: 2014-10-30 do 12:18</p>
 <p class="creator">Emacs 24.3.1 (Org mode 8.2.4)</p>
 <p class="validation"><a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer">Validate</a></p>
 </div>

Modified: www/packageReviewGuidelines.org
===================================================================
--- www/packageReviewGuidelines.org	2014-10-29 22:11:48 UTC (rev 1875)
+++ www/packageReviewGuidelines.org	2014-10-30 11:19:40 UTC (rev 1876)
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #+TITLE: GenABEL Project Package Review Guidelines
 #+DATE: <2014-04-26 za>
 #+AUTHOR: Y. Aulchenko, L.C. Karssen
-#+EMAIL: l.c.karssen at gmail.com
+#+EMAIL: lennart at karssen.org
 #+OPTIONS: ':nil *:t -:t ::t <:t H:3 \n:nil ^:t arch:headline
 #+OPTIONS: author:t c:nil creator:comment d:(not "LOGBOOK") date:t
 #+OPTIONS: e:t email:nil f:t inline:t num:t p:nil pri:t stat:t tags:t
@@ -41,9 +41,10 @@
   welcomed.
 
   Note that our coding style closely follows the Google style guide and
-  is documented at [[file:codingstyle.html][here]].
+  is documented [[file:codingstyle.html][here]].
 
 * Legal issues
+** Is the copyright holder clearly mentioned?
 ** Is there a clear (standard) license?
 ** Is the license GNU GPL-compatible?
 * Technical quality

