[FLR-list] @spwn in FLBiol and @m.spwn and @harvest.spwn in FLStock

[Iago MOSQUEIRA (JRC)]

Hi,

Yes, it is, but the decision on FLStock structure was made a long time 
ago and will be difficult to change, maybe at some point we can try.

The logic is that @spwn in FLBiol does not need ages, so let's keep it 
smaller. Depending on your workflow (FLBiol -> FLStock or viceversa) we 
an look at the accessors, replacement, constructor and coercion methods 
to make it smoother. For example, coercion from FLBiol to FLStock 
expands the slot, but maybe the assignment method m.spwn<- could also do 
it when given an FLQuant with a single age.

How are you converting between both?

Cheers,


Iago

On 21/01/17 16:26, Dorleta Garcia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We are updating FLBEIA to the lastest FLCore version and I’ve realized
> that now ‘spwn’ slot in FLBiol has length equal one in the first
> dimension, you can create an object with length bigger than one but the
> validity crashes. However in FLStock object  @m.spwn and @harvest.spwn
> share the dimension with the rest of age structured stocks.
>
>
>
> Is not this contradictory?
>
>
>
> I don’t know if it makes sense to have age dependent spawn season but at
> least both objects should have the same flexibility, or even higher in
> FLBiols.
>
>
>
> Thanks and cheers,
>
>
>
> Dorleta
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> flr-list mailing list
> flr-list at flr-project.org
> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/flr-list
>

-- 
Dr Iago Mosqueira

European Commission
DG Joint Research Centre
Directorate D - Sustainable Resources
Unit D.02 Water and Marine Resources

TP 051, Via Enrico Fermi 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy

Phone : +39 0332 785413

iago.mosqueira at jrc.ec.europa.eu