From edd at debian.org Sun Jan 4 17:01:14 2015 From: edd at debian.org (Dirk Eddelbuettel) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 10:01:14 -0600 Subject: [Boostheaders-devel] [Bioc-devel] Boost packaged on rforge In-Reply-To: References: <1367412709.7165.39.camel@paddy.ipb-sub.ipb-halle.de> <20865.10098.545262.778460@max.nulle.part> <1367446751.7165.102.camel@paddy.ipb-sub.ipb-halle.de> <20866.20454.791059.7474@max.nulle.part> Message-ID: <21673.25546.992127.751772@max.nulle.part> This picks up an old thread from 2013 about Boost.Graph and BH in which Vince et al offered to look into what it would take to add Graph to BH. I now have a use case for Boost Graph, so I'll add it to BH -- but without the ability to do parsing as we are header-only in BH. Boost Graph says: The Boost Graph Library is a header-only library and does not need to be built to be used. The only exceptions are the GraphViz input parser and the GraphML parser. Looking at the copy of RBGL 1.28 I have here on my (implicit) CRAN mirror (via CRANberries) I see that you bundle an include directory. So it seems I can help you there. Can you confirm that you don't do parsing and do not generally link to Boost Graph? I opened an issue ticket here: https://github.com/eddelbuettel/bh/issues/9 Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org From stvjc at channing.harvard.edu Sun Jan 4 17:35:02 2015 From: stvjc at channing.harvard.edu (Vincent Carey) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 11:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Boostheaders-devel] [Bioc-devel] Boost packaged on rforge In-Reply-To: <21673.25546.992127.751772@max.nulle.part> References: <1367412709.7165.39.camel@paddy.ipb-sub.ipb-halle.de> <20865.10098.545262.778460@max.nulle.part> <1367446751.7165.102.camel@paddy.ipb-sub.ipb-halle.de> <20866.20454.791059.7474@max.nulle.part> <21673.25546.992127.751772@max.nulle.part> Message-ID: Clearly I dropped the ball on this. Is the iterative approach to discovering and specifying the additional headers, given by Steffen Neumann on 5/2/13, still valid? I would like to use BH if possible for maintaining RBGL. However I won't be able to get involved until March at the earliest. On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > This picks up an old thread from 2013 about Boost.Graph and BH in which > Vince > et al offered to look into what it would take to add Graph to BH. > > I now have a use case for Boost Graph, so I'll add it to BH -- but without > the ability to do parsing as we are header-only in BH. > > Boost Graph says: > > The Boost Graph Library is a header-only library and does not need to be > built to be used. The only exceptions are the GraphViz input parser and > the GraphML parser. > > Looking at the copy of RBGL 1.28 I have here on my (implicit) CRAN mirror > (via CRANberries) I see that you bundle an include directory. So it seems > I > can help you there. > > Can you confirm that you don't do parsing and do not generally link to > Boost > Graph? > > I opened an issue ticket here: > > https://github.com/eddelbuettel/bh/issues/9 > > > Dirk > > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: