Of course outActIntn refers to the "Effect of out-degree in W on X-activity" and not to the "Effect of in-degree in W on X-activity" as I mentioned earlier.<br>Nevertheless I had problem with the in-degree one (inActIntn).<br>
<br>Sorry for the confusion.<br><br>Marco<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:56 PM, marco tonellato <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:m.tonellato@gmail.com">m.tonellato@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Dear All,<br><br>while specifying a model for bipartite analysis, I encountered a problem related to degree-related effects of a one-mode network (W, the explanatory variable) to the bipartite one (X, the dependent variable).<br>
<br>In particular, I couldn't specify the "Effect of in-degree in W on X-activity" (inActIntn) as outlined in the latest version of RSiena manual (7th September) at page 122.<br><br><br>The code I used is the following:<br>
<br>bipEffects <- includeEffects (bipEffects, inActIntn, name="X", interaction1="W")<br><br>Alternatively I tried the setEffect function:<br><br>bipEffects <- setEffect (bipEffects, inActIntn, name="X", interaction1="W", parameter=2)<br>
<br>In both cases the effect was not found.<br><br>The other degree-related effect using the bipartite network as dependent variable and the one-mode network as explanatory - "Effect of in-degree in W on X-activity" (outActIntn) - was instead specified without problems.<br>
<br>Could you please help me understanding what I'm missing here?<br><br>Thanks a lot in advance.<br><font color="#888888"><br>Marco<br><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>