<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Romain Francois <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:romain@r-enthusiasts.com">romain@r-enthusiasts.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Le 16/07/10 01:18, Dominick Samperi a écrit :<div class="im"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Currently Rcpp 0.8.4 builds cleanly at CRAN under Windows only<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
This is as close to nonsense as it can be, please stop this quest of yours to advertise problems that do not exist and RTFM<br></blockquote><div><br>I am only reporting what CRAN shows (does it publish nonsense?). My only "quest" is to<br>
prevent crashes of my work every time Rcpp does a release. I decided to use Rcpp because<br>I thought we could cooperate on testing.<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
The author of that package chose to not follow the documented way to pull in the headers , which is as I told you before to add<br></blockquote><div><br>The "documented way" is a moving target, and the only defense is to test before doing a release.<br>
(both unit testing and integration testing).<br><br>Since you "forgot" to add the GNU make system dependency I guess you could use a little<br>review of the "documented way" as well.<br><br>Dominick<br>
<br></div></div><br>