[Rcpp-devel] RInside vs Statconndcom

[David Ibarra Gómez]

Hello Jodi,

        What Dirk told you it's very important to decide. Moreover I have been using both solutions.

I started to use "statconndcom" because windows requirements. Finally I have been able to remove (or avoid by using "remote" debian server and google protocol buffers messaging) windows requirements and I use RInside (also with MPI on multicore or cluster). I haven't complete a serious benchmark, but I "feel" it performs much faster that when I use to use C# and "statconndcom".

Regards





David Ibarra Gómez
Jefe de Proyectos
Dirección de Ingeniería de Sistemas
Aqualogy Aqua Ambiente
dibarra at aquology.net






-----Mensaje original-----
De: rcpp-devel-bounces at lists.r-forge.r-project.org [mailto:rcpp-devel-bounces at lists.r-forge.r-project.org] En nombre de Dirk Eddelbuettel
Enviado el: sábado, 04 de abril de 2015 20:46
Para: Jodi Jhouranda Siregar
CC: rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
Asunto: Re: [Rcpp-devel] RInside vs Statconndcom


On 5 April 2015 at 00:54, Jodi Jhouranda Siregar wrote:
| I'm on my project developing user interface for r. I dicided to use rinside.
| And i want to know which is better in term of peformance, RInside or
| statconndcom ? For the reason why using RInside is better than statconndcom.

Not a well-posed question.

You only want statconndcom if some (local) reason you must live in a Windows stack. Your app will not be portable, so choose carefully.

RInside pretty works everywhere but requires the same compiler you use for R. It is pretty well-tested and mature.

Dirk

--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org _______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

Disclaimer: http://disclaimer.aqualogy.net/