[Rcpp-devel] statement about rcpp11 ?
krzysztof.sakrejda at gmail.com
Tue Sep 30 20:24:09 CEST 2014
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Jonathon Love <jon at thon.cc> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> thanks for your response romain,
>> If you want to have a private conversation with Dirk, just email
>> him directly
> sure, but i expect i'm not the only one interested in his response.
>> Just use whatever version is best for your needs.
> sure, i get that; but i (and i imagine others) would be interested to
> hear dirk's take on it. the reality is that we can't read every piece
> of code to evaluate software projects, and so we often come to rely on
> the opinion of an experienced professional that we have come to trust;
> and for me (and others!) that's dirk.\
That makes sense, but if you search the list archives (which is
of folks writing to the list) you would notice some context which makes your
original questions look a little bit like trolling---having seen
previous exchanges on the
topic of Rcpp11, I couldn't tell if you were serious or not.
Hope that helps,
> anyhow, dirk, still keen to hear your thoughts :), and find your
> silence on this a little perplexing.
> kind regards
> - --
> JASP - A Fresh Way to Do Statistics
> - --
> How happy is he born and taught,
> That serveth not another's will;
> Whose armour is his honest thought,
> And simple truth his utmost skill
> This man is freed from servile bands
> Of hope to rise, or fear to fall:
> Lord of himself, though not of lands,
> And, having nothing, yet hath all.
> -- Sir Henry Wotton
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Rcpp-devel mailing list
> Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
More information about the Rcpp-devel