[Rcpp-devel] Unit Test Question Was: pnorm/qnorm?

Christian Gunning xian at unm.edu
Thu Sep 13 13:58:20 CEST 2012


On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:59 AM,
<rcpp-devel-request at lists.r-forge.r-project.org> wrote:
>
> The "pixie dust" referred to your assertions that we "used some secret tools"
> or "were hiding something".
>
> Neither one is true.  It's all there.  It's just damn hard to read. But it's
> not hidden...

I'm officially of the opinion the template code is isomorphic to magic
pixie dust:  works, works well, don't really understand it.
I've been meaning to ask, though... what's with the conspicuous lack
of comments in the codebase?  Is this just a terse coding style?
-Christian


-- 
A man, a plan, a cat, a ham, a yak, a yam, a hat, a canal – Panama!


More information about the Rcpp-devel mailing list